SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

P I Samba & Company Advocates v Linear Credit Limited & another (Miscellaneous Application E170 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 1223 (KLR) (7 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 1223 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1223
Citation
[2025] KEELC 1223 (KLR)
Decided
7 March 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureAppeal from the decision of a taxing masterCoramM.D. MWANGI
The court finds that the taxing master did not have jurisdiction to determine the existence of an Advocate-Client relationship and dismisses the chambers summons with costs to the Respondents.

Facts

The Advocate/Applicant challenged the ruling of the Taxing Master, Hon. I.N. Barasa, who struck out the bill of costs. The Advocate/Applicant alleged that the Taxing Master failed to appreciate the list and bundle of documents and submissions that evinced the Advocate received and acted on instructions from the Respondents to negotiate the sale of the suit property.

Issues

  • Whether a taxing master has jurisdiction to determine the existence or otherwise of an Advocate-Client relationship in the course of taxing an Advocate-Client Bill of Costs.
  • Whether there was an Advocate-Client relationship between the Advocate/Applicant and the Respondents.
  • Dependent on the outcome of (b) above, what order should the court issue in respect to the Advocate-Client bill of costs the subject matter of these proceedings and the impugned ruling of the taxing master.

Reasoning

The court agrees with the taxing master's findings that the instructing clients were not the entities sued as the 1st and 2nd Respondents. The Advocate/Applicant has not proved that the Respondents instructed her to act as their Advocate.

Outcome

The chambers summons dated 4th December 2023 is dismissed with costs to the Respondents.

Orders

  • Dismissal of the chambers summons with costs to the Respondents.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case