SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tormoi (Suing as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Kiptormoi) v Saina (Suing as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joel Kipsaina Korir) (Environment & Land Case 90 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 1391 (KLR) (20 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 1391 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1391
Citation
[2025] KEELC 1391 (KLR)
Decided
20 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramLA OMOLLO
Holding

The Defendant/Applicant's application for a stay of execution is allowed, and leave is granted to the firm of J.K Bosek and Company Advocates to come on record for the Defendant/Applicant.

Facts

The Plaintiff and Defendant are personal representatives of estates. The Plaintiff sought a declaration and an order to dissolve a trust, while the Defendant/Applicant sought a stay of execution pending appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant/Applicant's application for a stay of execution has merit.
  2. Whether there is a pending appeal before the Court of Appeal.

Reasoning

The court considered the application's merit and the criteria for granting a stay of execution pending appeal. The court found that the application was not filed without reasonable delay and that the Defendant/Applicant demonstrated substantial loss if the orders were not granted. However, the appeal before the Court of Appeal had lapsed.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the firm of J.K Bosek and Company Advocates to come on record for the Defendant/Applicant.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Stay of execution pending appeal granted.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (2)
  • RWW v EKW (2019) eKLR
  • Absalom Dova v Tarbo Transporters (2013) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case