SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kipsiro & another v County Government of Uasin Gishu (Environment & Land Case 42 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 151 (KLR) (22 January 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 151 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
151
Citation
[2025] KEELC 151 (KLR)
Decided
22 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJ. M. ONYANGO
Holding

The Plaintiffs are the lawful owners of the land parcel and the Defendant unlawfully encroached upon it.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim to be the lawful owners of land parcel Eldoret Municipality Block 7/255, which the Defendant allegedly encroached upon. The Plaintiffs presented evidence of their ownership through a lease and certificate of lease.

Issues

  1. Who are the registered proprietors of land parcel Eldoret Municipality Block 7/255?
  2. Whether the Defendant's acts amount to unlawful encroachment on the suit property?
  3. Whether compensation should be awarded to the Plaintiffs for compulsory acquisition of the suit property?

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs presented clear evidence of their ownership through a lease and certificate of lease. The Defendant's actions were found to be unlawful as they lacked a lawful basis.

Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiffs

Orders

  • A Declaration that Plaintiffs are the lawful owners of the land parcel.
  • A Declaration that Defendant unlawfully encroached on the land parcel.
  • Compulsory acquisition process within 6 months if Defendant fails to initiate.
  • Eviction order if Defendant fails to vacate the land within 6 months.
  • Permanent injunction against Defendant's agents from encroaching on the land.
  • Defendant to bear the costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Eviction order
  • Permanent injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Registration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case