SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Korio & another v Korinko & 6 others (Petition E005 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 2866 (KLR) (27 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 2866 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2866
Citation
[2025] KEELC 2866 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureRespondent's Application for Stay of Execution and Stay of ProceedingsCoramMN MWANYALE
The application for stay of execution is hereby dismissed with costs.

Facts

The 1st and 2nd Petitioners filed a petition seeking to set aside the ruling of the court dated 29th January 2025. The 1st Respondent filed a Notice of Appeal against the ruling. The 1st Applicant filed a Notice of Motion application seeking a stay of execution of the ruling and further proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the substantive appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the application for stay of execution of the ruling is merited
  • Whether a stay of execution can issue in respect of a negative order

Reasoning

The court dismissed an application filed by the petitioner/applicant on 29th January 2025. The current application for stay of execution is not merited as a dismissal is a negative order and stay orders cannot issue in respect of negative orders. The court also dismissed the application for stay of proceedings as it is a grave judicial action that seriously interferes with the right to conduct litigation.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application for stay of execution and stay of proceedings dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Githundu v Waithaka (Civil Application) E024 of 2021 [2022] KELR
  • Kenya Wildlife Service v James Mutembei [2019] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case