SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Onyango v Makanyanga & another (Environment & Land Case 178 of 2016 & E006 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEELC 2923 (KLR) (27 March 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 2923 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
2923
Citation
[2025] KEELC 2923 (KLR)
Decided
27 March 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramDO OHUNGO
Boniface Onyango is the registered proprietor of the land parcel Kakamega/Chekalini/29. Wanjala Makanyanga and Joseph Simiyu are ordered to vacate the land within 120 days and are restrained from trespassing on the land.

Facts

Boniface Onyango claimed to be the registered proprietor of land parcel Kakamega/Chekalini/29, which Wanjala Makanyanga and Joseph Simiyu were alleged to have trespassed into. Wanjala claimed adverse possession, while Joseph claimed he had purchased the land from Edward Barasa and was in adverse possession.

Issues

  • Ownership of the land parcel Kakamega/Chekalini/29
  • Mesne profits

Reasoning

The court found that Boniface's title was unimpeached and he was entitled to the benefits of proprietorship, including eviction and permanent injunction. However, the claim for mesne profits was dismissed due to lack of proof.

Outcome

Boniface Onyango is the registered proprietor of the land parcel.

Orders

  • Wanjala Makanyanga and Joseph Simiyu to vacate the land within 120 days
  • Permanent injunction against trespassing on the land

Remedies

  • Eviction of Wanjala Makanyanga and Joseph Simiyu
  • Permanent injunction against trespassing

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22 Laws
Cases cited (1)
  • Christine Nyanchama Oanda v Catholic Diocese of Homa Bay Registered Trustees [2020] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case