SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Samuru Gituto Farmers Co-operative Society Limited v Chief Land Registrar & 10 others (Environment & Land Case 52B of 2023) [2025] KEELC 3253 (KLR) (2 April 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 3253 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3253
Citation
[2025] KEELC 3253 (KLR)
Decided
2 April 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivilPostureApplication for interim and temporary injunctionsCoramJM ONYANGO, Turner L.
The application is unmerited and the preliminary objection is not sustained.

Facts

Samuru Gituto Farmers Co-operative Society Limited filed a suit against various respondents alleging fraud in the acquisition of land and seeking to prevent the respondents from developing and disposing of the land.

Issues

  • Whether the preliminary objection should be sustained
  • Whether the application is merited

Reasoning

The court found that the suit was not time-barred and that the applicant could not rely on the doctrine of lis pendens. The court also determined that the loss can be compensated by an award of damages.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Orders

  • Status quo maintained with regard to the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  • The costs of the application shall be in the cause.

Remedies

  • Award of damages to compensate for the loss incurred by the applicant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Limitation of Actions Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Company Ltd v West End Distributors Limited (1969) E.A 696
  • Ruthi Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gachure & another [2015] eKLR
  • Virginia Edith Wambui vs Joash Ochieng Ougo Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1987 eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case