SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Woburn Estate Limited v Punjani & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 22 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 3756 (KLR) (7 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 3756 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3756
Citation
[2025] KEELC 3756 (KLR)
Decided
7 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeRepossession of ApartmentPosturePlaintiff's SuccessCoramEK MAKORI
Holding

The lease agreement was discharged due to breach by the Defendants, and a vesting order was issued for Apartment 7E.

Facts

Woburn Estate Limited and NINAZ PUNJANI entered into a lease agreement. PUNJANI was in arrears of Ksh 5,611,761.73. The lease agreement provided for the company to re-enter the premises if the service charge was not paid.

Issues

  1. Whether the lease agreement was discharged due to breach by the Defendants
  2. Whether a vesting order should be issued for Apartment 7E

Reasoning

The Defendants were in arrears of a significant amount, and the lease agreement allowed the company to re-enter the premises if the service charge was not paid. The court found the Defendants in breach and allowed the prayers.

Outcome

Plaintiff's Success

Orders

  • A vesting order vesting Apartment 7E of Block 7 within portion number 10714 Folio 666/1596 in the names of Woburn Estate Limited

Remedies

  • Costs to be met by the Defendants
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case