SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Motorline Limited v Allex Motors Limited & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 704 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 3952 (KLR) (22 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 3952 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3952
Citation
[2025] KEELC 3952 (KLR)
Decided
22 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from an original trialCoramGikonyo, OA ANGOTE
Holding

The court found that the lease agreement had terminated by euxion of time, and the Defendants had vacated the suit property in July 2020. There was no material breach of the terms of the lease agreement by the Defendants, and there are no rental arrears owing to the Plainti by the Defendants.

Facts

Motorline Limited sued Allex Motors Limited and Triple N Car Clinic Limited for breach of a lease agreement, unpaid rent, and mesne profits. The lease agreement was for six years, from July 15, 2014, to July 2020. The 1st Defendant (Allex Motors Limited) sublet the property to the 2nd Defendant (Triple N Car Clinic Limited) without the 1st Defendant's consent.

Issues

  1. Whether the 1st Defendant breached the lease agreement by subletting the property.
  2. Whether the 1st Defendant is in rental arrears.
  3. Whether the Plainti is entitled to mesne profits from the 2nd Defendant.

Reasoning

The court adhered to the principle that courts do not make contracts for the parties and cannot re-write the terms of the contract. The Plainti claimed subletting was in breach of the lease agreement, but the court found that the lease had terminated and there was no evidence of unpaid rent.

Outcome

The Plainti's claims were dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Trollope Colls Ltd v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board (1973) 1 WLR 601
  • The Law of Guarantees by Geraldine Andrews & Richard Millet 2nd Edition
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case