SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gachu & another v Ndocha & another (Environment & Land Case 41 of 2008) [2025] KEELC 3985 (KLR) (22 May 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 3985 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3985
Citation
[2025] KEELC 3985 (KLR)
Decided
22 May 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSpecific PerformancePostureAppeal from an original trialCoramOA ANGOTE
Holding

The court denied the Plaintiffs' request for specific performance and ordered them to pay the sum of Kshs. 2,203,178.90 to the Defendants.

Facts

The Plaintiffs claim that they have paid 96% of the purchase price for the property and are entitled to specific performance or damages for breach of contract. The Defendants dispute the claim and have not called witnesses.

Issues

  1. Whether this court should issue orders for specific performance.
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to damages for breach of contract.

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiffs had not paid the full purchase price and had made some payments towards the outgoings. The court also noted that the Defendants had not called any witnesses to support their case.

Outcome

The court denied the Plaintiffs' request for specific performance and ordered them to pay the sum of Kshs. 2,203,178.90 to the Defendants.

Orders

  • An order of specific performance to issue commanding and compelling the Defendants to transfer the L.R No. Nairobi Block 82/782 Savannah Estate Phase 1 House No. 31 to the Plaintiffs.
  • An order to pay the sum of Kshs. 2,203,178.90 to the Defendants.

Remedies

  • Damages for breach of contract.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Evidence Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Reliable Electrical Engineers (K) Ltd v Mantrac Kenya Limited [2006] KEHC 2855 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case