SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wa Maina (Suing on His Own Behalf and as the Chairman of Lavington Five Roads Association c/o Githara & Associates Advocates) v National Environment Management Authority & another (Environment and Land Appeal E007 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4756 (KLR) (19 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 4756 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4756
Citation
[2025] KEELC 4756 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the decision of the National Environment TribunalCoramAA OMOLLO, Another, Sachs
The project is classified as medium risk, and the 2nd Respondent was only required to comply with Regulation 7, which requires a project report.

Facts

The National Environment Management Authority (1st Respondent) issued an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) License to Woodridge Centre Limited (2nd Respondent) for a petrol station project. The Chairman of Lavington Five Roads Association challenged the decision.

Issues

  • Whether the project was classified as high or medium risk.
  • Whether public participation was undertaken as required.
  • Whether the EIA license was lawfully and regularly issued.

Reasoning

The amendment to the second schedule of the Environment Management and Coordination Act declassified service stations from high risk to medium risk. The 2nd Respondent was thus only required to comply with Regulation 7, not Regulation 17.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed, and the EIA license is upheld.

Orders

  • Revocation of the EIA License No. NEMA/EIA/PSL/21303.
  • Restoration of the subject property, L.R No. 3734/790 to the condition before the issuance of the EIA License.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Environment Management and Coordination Act (EMCA)
  • Environmental (Impact Assessment & Audit) Regulations, 2003
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case