Republic v Nairobi City County; Ibrahim (Exparte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 4 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 48 (KLR) (16 January 2025) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 48
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 48 (KLR)
- Decided
- 16 January 2025
The court has jurisdiction to entertain and determine the matter.
Facts
Ex-parte Applicant is a resident and chairman of Utamu Estate. He alleges that the Respondent served him an enforcement notice to remove developments on L.R. No. 5908/8/180 within 14 days from the date of the enforcement notice dated 21st November 2023, which he claims was issued on a non-existent property.
Issues
- Whether the court has jurisdiction to determine this matter.
- Whether the ex-parte Applicant's Notice of Motion is merited.
- Whether the ex-parte Applicant is entitled to the orders of certiorari and prohibition.
- What orders should issue on courts?
Reasoning
The court addressed the preliminary objection raised by the Respondent, stating that the ex-parte Applicant had not exhausted the statutory dispute resolution mechanisms as provided under Section 72 of PLUPA. The court found that the ex-parte Applicant's decision to seek relief before the court was justified due to the non-constitution of the Nairobi County Physical and Land use Planning Liaison Committee.
Outcome
The court dismissed the preliminary objection.
Orders
- The court has jurisdiction to entertain and determine the matter.
- The court has not found the ex-parte Applicant's Notice of Motion to be premature and lacks jurisdiction to entertain it.
Remedies
- The court has not made any specific remedies or orders at this stage.
Authorities cited
Legislation (4)
- Law Reform Act
- Civil Procedure Rules
- Fair Administrative Action Act
- PLUPA
Cases cited (1)
- Kenya Bureau of Standards and 4 others; Ex-parte United Millers Limited; Department of Health Services, Nakuru County (interested party), Mativo J (as he then was)
Loading judgment…