SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ntiapuyok & another v Puffins Investment Limited & 2 others (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 203 & 222 of 2017 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEELC 5204 (KLR) (10 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 5204 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
5204
Citation
[2025] KEELC 5204 (KLR)
Decided
10 July 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal PendingCoramGicheru, MD MWANGI, Odunga, Visram
An order of injunction is granted in favour of the Applicants, restraining the Defendants from selling, transferring, or disposing of the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the appeal in the Court of Appeal.

Facts

The Plaintiffs are concerned about the sale of the suit property by the 1st Defendant, which they fear may render their appeal nugatory. They seek an injunction and stay of execution.

Issues

  • Whether the orders sought by the Applicants should issue.

Reasoning

The court grants the injunction to preserve the subject matter in dispute and protect the rights of the appellants, considering the imminent risk of sale and the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Act.

Outcome

Appeal Granted

Orders

  • Order of injunction

Remedies

  • Preservation of the suit property

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Patricia Njeri & 3 others –vs- National Museum of Kenya (2004) eKLR
  • Shem David Mukumbi –vs- Alice Nzula Kilonzo (2021) KEHC 13430 (KLR)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case