Shurie v Bundid (Environment and Land Case 9 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 6183 (KLR) (24 September 2025) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 6183
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 6183 (KLR)
- Decided
- 24 September 2025
The court dismisses the suit with no order as to costs, as neither party proved their case on a balance of probabilities.
Facts
Abdi Noor Shurie claimed ownership of Plot No. GSA/1906, while Halima Bundid claimed ownership of Plot No. GSA/1898. Shurie claimed he inherited the plot from his deceased father and had been registered as its owner, while Bundid claimed she inherited the plot from her deceased father and that Shurie could not have been allocated the land.
Issues
- Ownership of Plot No. GSA/1906
- Ownership of Plot No. GSA/1898
Reasoning
The court found that Shurie failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities regarding the allocation of Plot No. GSA/1906, and that Bundid did not prove ownership of Plot No. GSA/1898. The court dismissed the suit with no order as to costs.
Outcome
Dismissal of the suit with no order as to costs
Authorities cited
Cases cited (1)
- Wreck Motors Enterprises v Commissioner of Lands & 3 Others (1997) eKLR
Loading judgment…