SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ray Pharmaceuticals Limited & 6 others v County Government of Kiambu; County Government of Kiambu (Plaintiff to the Counterclaim); Ray Pharmaceuticals Limited & 6 others (Defendant to the Counterclaim) (Environment and Land Case 1191 of 2013) [2025] KEELC 6376 (KLR) (30 April 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 6376 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
6376
Citation
[2025] KEELC 6376 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEnvironmental and Land CasePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJudy Omange
Grant numbers for certain properties are declared null and void, and the Plaintiffs are granted a permanent injunction.

Facts

The Plaintiffs filed a plaint seeking various orders to prevent the Defendant from interfering with their properties and boundary walls. The Plaintiffs also claimed that certain grant numbers for properties were obtained through fraud and were therefore null and void.

Issues

  • Validity of grant numbers
  • Interference with properties

Reasoning

The court found that the grant numbers were obtained through fraud and misrepresentation, thus rendering them null and void.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Declaration of grant numbers as null and void
  • Cancellation of grant numbers
  • Permanent injunction against interference with properties

Remedies

  • Declaration of grant numbers as null and void
  • Cancellation of grant numbers
  • Permanent injunction against interference with properties
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case