SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Omusundi v Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission & 2 others (Environment and Land Petition E002 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 6670 (KLR) (2 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 6670 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
6670
Citation
[2025] KEELC 6670 (KLR)
Decided
2 October 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureApplication to set aside and reinstate an applicationCoramOMBWAYO
The application is dismissed with costs.

Facts

Susan Kiprono and her family filed an application on 15th October, 2024, which was dismissed on 27th January, 2025. The 2nd interested party was present in court but her call dropped. The 1st interested party filed an application on 10th April, 2025, seeking contempt of court.

Issues

  • Ownership of a disputed parcel of land
  • Delay in filing the application

Reasoning

The court dismissed the application due to the applicant's failure to explain satisfactorily why her advocate failed to attend court on the 27th of January 2025, and the applicant's delay in filing the application.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application dated 15th October, 2024 and 26th November, 2024 to be reinstated and heard on priority basis
  • Application dated 10th April, 2025 to be stayed pending the hearing

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Utalii Transport Co. Ltd and 3 Others -vs- N.I.C. Bank and Another (2014) e KLR
  • Kenya Power & Lightning Co. Ltd -vs- Alliance Media Kenya Ltd (2014) e KLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case