SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nurani & another (Suing as the legal administrators of the Estate of Sadrudin Shamsudin Ismail Nurani) v Gulam & 2 others (Environment & Land Case 596 of 2014) [2025] KEELC 682 (KLR) (20 February 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 682 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
682
Citation
[2025] KEELC 682 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureMotion for Stay of Execution Pending AppealCoramKuloba, Munyao, Mutungi, OA ANGOTE
Holding

The court finds that the 2nd Defendant/Applicant has not satisfactorily discharged the conditions warranting the grant of a stay of execution pending appeal.

Facts

The 2nd Defendant/Applicant seeks a stay of execution of a June 2024 judgment and decree, claiming the Plaintiffs had knowledge of the suit property's existence and subsequent sale as early as 2003, and the Plaintiffs' suit was time barred.

Issues

  1. Whether the 2nd Defendant/Applicant has satisfied the conditions warranting the grant of a stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs have knowledge of the suit property's existence and subsequent sale as early as 2003, and if the Plaintiffs' suit was time barred.

Reasoning

The court applies the provisions of Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, finding that the 2nd Defendant/Applicant has not demonstrated substantial or irreparable harm that would result if the orders sought are not granted.

Outcome

The motion for stay of execution pending appeal is denied.

Orders

  • The court denies the motion for stay of execution pending appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Environment and Land Court Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Vishram Ravji Halai vs Thornton & Turpin Civil Application No. Nai. 15 of 1990
  • Butt vs Rent Restriction Tribunal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case