SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ruto (Suing as the Legal Personal Representative of the Estate of Kibiwott Arap Mwolomet - Deceased) v Maina & another (Environment and Land Case 19 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 7168 (KLR) (22 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 7168 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
7168
Citation
[2025] KEELC 7168 (KLR)
Decided
22 October 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEnvironment and Land CasePostureApplication for attachment and prohibitionCoramCK NZILI
The court declines the application and orders no order as to costs.

Facts

The plaintiff, Japheth Kibiwott Ruto, is the legal personal representative of the estate of Kibiwott Arap Mwolemet. The plaintiff sued the defendants, Virginia Njeri Maina and Vincent Rongei Kotokoto, for costs assessed at Kshs. 736,120/=. The defendants appealed against the dismissal of their case. The plaintiff applied for the attachment of the respondent's land for sale to recover the costs.

Issues

  • Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the application for attachment and prohibition.
  • Whether the plaintiff is entitled to execute for the costs imposed against the respondent.

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has jumped the gun and that the court has no original jurisdiction to hear and determine matters falling under Orders 22 and 49 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The application is declined.

Outcome

The application is declined.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Law of Succession Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case