SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Omboto & 3 others v Board of Trustees National Social Security Fund & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 391 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 7570 (KLR) (4 November 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEELC 7570 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
7570
Citation
[2025] KEELC 7570 (KLR)
Decided
4 November 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeChamber Summons ApplicationPosturePlaintiffs seek leave to further amend their plaint to substitute themselves with the Association of Nyayo Embakasi Property Owners (ANEPO).CoramCA OCHIENG
The Court grants leave to amend the Plaintiffs' pleadings.

Facts

The Plaintiffs seek to substitute themselves with the Association of Nyayo Embakasi Property Owners (ANEPO) in the ongoing proceedings.

Issues

  • Whether the Plaintiffs should be granted leave to further amend their plaint to substitute themselves with the Association of Nyayo Embakasi Property Owners (ANEPO).

Reasoning

The Court considers the Civil Procedure Rules and previous cases to determine that the Plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend their pleadings, despite the delay and the potential for prejudice to the Defendant.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs are granted leave to further amend their plaint to substitute themselves with the Association of Nyayo Embakasi Property Owners (ANEPO).

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Order 1 Rule 10
  • Order 8 Rule 3
Cases cited (3)
  • Central Kenya Ltd v Trust Bank Ltd & 5 Others [2000] KECA 367 (KLR)
  • K. K. Lodgit Limited v Geminia Insurance Company Ltd & Another (2021) eKLR
  • Bernard Mwangi Nderitu & 5 Others v Ndiara Enterprise Limited [2021] KEELC 589 (KLR)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case