SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v County Secretary, County Government of Uasin Gishu & 2 others; Wanjao (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E002 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8205 (KLR) (27 November 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEELC 8205 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
8205
Citation
[2025] KEELC 8205 (KLR)
Decided
27 November 2025
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Order of Mandamus and CostsCoramCK YANO, Muchemi, Odunga
The application is time barred, but the Notice of Motion is merited.

Facts

Wangari Wanjao applied for an order of mandamus compelling the County Secretary and Chief Officer Finance to pay a judgment of Kshs. 3,000,000 and interest, along with costs.

Issues

  • Whether the application is time barred.
  • Whether an Order of Mandamus can issue.
  • Whether the Notice of Motion is merited.
  • Who shall bear the costs of the Application.

Reasoning

The court found the application time barred due to the late filing, but the Notice of Motion was found merited as the applicant sufficiently proved her claim.

Outcome

The Notice of Motion is allowed with the issuance of an Order of Mandamus and costs to be borne by the respondents.

Orders

  • An Order of Mandamus is issued compelling the respondents to pay the judgment and interest.
  • Costs of the Application are to be borne by the respondents.

Remedies

  • Payment of the judgment and interest.
  • Payment of taxed costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law Reform Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Joseph Muriithi Nyaga v Embu County
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case