Sweet Pie Company Limited v Randu (Environment and Land Case E011 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 8516 (KLR) (26 November 2025) (Judgment)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 8516
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 8516 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 November 2025
Summary at a glance
TypeLand and EnvironmentPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramEK MAKORI, Kennedy, Mr. L.
The court found in favor of the Plainti on all issues.
Facts
Sweet Pie Company Limited (Plaintiff) claims that Daniel Hare Randu (Defendant) trespassed on their property and demolished a perimeter wall. The Plaintiff's employee, Mr. Samuel Charo, witnessed the incident on July 19, 2023. Mr. Fedinard Katunda confirmed that the Defendant sold land to the Plaintiff.
Issues
- whether the Plainti has proven ownership of the suit property
- whether the Plainti has demonstrated that the Defendant trespassed on the property
- whether the Defendant's counterclaim is justied
- who should bear the costs of this suit
Reasoning
The court ruled that the Plaintiff has proven ownership of the property and that the Defendant trespassed. The court also dismissed the Defendant's counterclaim.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim for trespass and property damage upheld
- Defendant's counterclaim dismissed
Remedies
- Plaintiff awarded damages for trespass and property damage
- Defendant ordered to pay costs of the suit
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…