SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyandigisi & 2 others (Suing as the Personal Representatives of Johnson Nyandigisi Maoga) v Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) (Environment and Land Case E027 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1700 (KLR) (25 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 1700 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1700
Citation
[2026] KEELC 1700 (KLR)
Decided
25 March 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramD. O. OHUNGO
The Court grants a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from interfering with the Plaintiffs' proprietary rights over the suit property.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, as personal representatives of Johnson Nyandigisi Maoga, claim to be the sole proprietors of a plot of land known as Kiberigo Market Plot No. 34. They have erected a petrol station and other permanent structures on the land for over forty years. The Defendant, Kenya National Highways Authority, issued a demolition notice to the Plaintiffs, claiming encroachment on the road reserve.

Issues

  • Ownership of the plot of land
  • Validity of the demolition notice
  • Permanent injunction against the Defendant

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs established a prima facie case that they have not encroached on the road reserve. The threat of demolition of their property makes damages an inadequate remedy, and the Court finds merit in the prayer for an injunction.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs' application for an injunction is granted.

Orders

  • An injunction is granted pending the hearing and determination of the suit

Remedies

  • Permanent injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (2)
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case