SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Oyigo v Pierluigia & another (Civil Suit 41 of 2019) [2026] KEELC 1877 (KLR) (23 March 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELC 1877 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1877
Citation
[2026] KEELC 1877 (KLR)
Decided
23 March 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramBuckley L., Kuloba, M., Supra Marshall
Holding

The Court held that the Applicant was entitled to exclusive ownership and possession of the suit property, and the fraudulent lease registration was voidable.

Facts

The Applicant Jessica Margaret Adhiambo Oyigo claimed rectification of the land register in respect of Title No. CR.13827/1 - Sub-division No. 1618 of Section 1 Mainland North, Mombasa County, alleging fraudulent lease registration in favour of the 1st Respondent Caffini Pierluigia. The Applicant sought a declaration of exclusive possession and possession of the land.

Issues

  1. Whether the instant suit was res judicata.
  2. Whether the Applicant was entitled to exclusive ownership and possession of the suit property.

Reasoning

The Court found that the Applicant's title to the property was clear and absolute, supported by legal documentation, and that the lease registration was fraudulent and without the Applicant's involvement.

Outcome

The Court granted the Applicant's claim for rectification of the land register and declared her exclusive possession and ownership of the suit property.

Orders

  • Rectification of the land register in favour of the Applicant.
  • Declaration of exclusive possession and ownership of the suit property.

Remedies

  • Rectification of the land register.
  • Declaration of exclusive possession and ownership of the suit property.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Registration Act, 2012.
Cases cited (1)
  • Nelson Kivuvani v Yuda Komora & Another (1991) Nairobi HCCC No.956.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.9 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case