SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic & another v District Land Registrar, Busia; Wanyama (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1933 (KLR) (9 April 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELC 1933 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
1933
Citation
[2026] KEELC 1933 (KLR)
Decided
9 April 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondent Responded to ApplicationCoramGEOFFREY MUTHIN, UMO
Holding

The District Land Registrar's decision to open a road of access through the suit land was valid

Facts

Joseph Juma Apusai is the registered proprietor of land parcel NO BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/14674. Julianana Nafula Wanyama attempted to create a road of access through the suit land, which Joseph Juma Apusai considers a 'short cut' to land parcel NO BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/14672.

Issues

  1. Whether the District Land Registrar's decision to open a road of access through the suit land was valid
  2. Whether the Interested Party's attempt to create the road of access was in accordance with the Land Registration Act

Reasoning

The Interested Party was given an opportunity to be heard, but she did not present any documentary evidence or request an adjournment. The prerogative of deciding when and where the hearing would be held was the responsibility of the Land Registrar.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • An order of Certiorari do and is hereby issued to call to this Court and quash the decision of the District Land Registrar Busia made on 18th June 2024 and 1st August 2024 opening a road of access through the land parcel NO BUKHAYO/MUNDIKA/14674

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Registration Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case