SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Phelix v Melrok Energy Limited & another (Land Case Appeal E032 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 2408 (KLR) (30 April 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 2408 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment and Land Court
Case number
2408
Citation
[2026] KEELC 2408 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2026
Judge
EK Wabwoto
Parties
raw · defendants · plaintiffs
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand Case AppealPostureAppeal from the Business Premises Rent Tribunal (BPRT) rulingCoramE. K. WABWOTO
The Court dismisses the contempt application and maintains the current status quo as directed by the Court on 14th April 2026, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The Appellant, Oswea Phelix, sought an order of stay of execution of the BPRT ruling and a temporary injunction against the Respondents, Melrok Energy Limited and Auckland Agencies Auctioneers, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the applications
  • Whether the Appellant has satisfied the conditions for the grant of an order of stay of execution and/or a temporary injunction
  • Whether the Respondents are in contempt of the orders of the Court

Reasoning

The Court found that the actions complained of were not in direct violation of any specific directive in the Appellant's case and were not willful disobedience of a Court order.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The current status quo as directed by the Court on 14th April 2026 shall be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • The Appellant shall remain in possession of Shop No. 3 on L.R. No. 136/7879 but shall not operate his business therein.
  • Execution of the BPRT ruling delivered on 19th February 2026 and any further distress, eviction, auction or adverse action by the Respondents is stayed.
  • The Respondents are restrained from interfering with the Appellant’s quiet possession of the said premises on the aforesaid terms.

Remedies

  • The Appellant shall remain in possession of Shop No. 3 on L.R. No. 136/7879 but shall not operate his business therein.
  • Execution of the BPRT ruling delivered on 19th February 2026 and any further distress, eviction, auction or adverse action by the Respondents is stayed.
  • The Respondents are restrained from interfering with the Appellant’s quiet possession of the said premises on the aforesaid terms.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case