SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Uno & 3 others v Letshego Kenya Limited & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E299 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 507 (KLR) (5 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 507 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
507
Citation
[2026] KEELC 507 (KLR)
Decided
5 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' case in favor of the 2nd defendant and staying the execution of the judgment for 120 days.CoramHancox
Holding

The plaintiffs/applicants' notice of motion is dismissed with costs, as it lacks merit and they have not demonstrated any substantial loss that they will suffer if the orders are not granted.

Facts

The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal and an application for injunction at the Court of Appeal, seeking to extend the stay of execution of the judgment granted by this court. The 2nd defendant/respondent opposed the application, arguing that no substantive appeal had been filed and that the plaintiffs/applicants had only filed a miscellaneous civil application for stay of execution.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant an extension of the stay of execution of the judgment
  2. Whether the plaintiffs/applicants are engaging in forum shopping

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiffs/applicants engaged in forum shopping and did not demonstrate any substantial loss that would be suffered if the orders were not granted. The court also noted that the plaintiffs/applicants have not filed a memorandum of appeal and that the doctrine of res judicata and res sub judice applies.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Shell Limited v Benjamin Karuga Kibiru & another [1986] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case