SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Keino v Uasin Gishu County Governor & another (Environment and Land Case E059 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 520 (KLR) (5 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 520 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
520
Citation
[2026] KEELC 520 (KLR)
Decided
5 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a final orderCoramHON. C. K. YANO
Holding

An order of temporary injunction is issued restraining the 1st and 2nd Respondents from trespassing, coming onto, or staying on the land, and from demolishing, constructing, or altering any building or structures, houses or fences or in any way dealing with the Applicants' property.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Ian Kipkosgei Keino, claims that the 1st and 2nd Defendants trespassed into and altered his land in Eldoret Municipality Blocks 13/103 and 13/100, claiming ownership. He purchased the land from Majorie Caroline Lloyd in 1992.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff has demonstrated that he is entitled to the injunction sought
  2. Whether the temporary prohibition order sought should issue

Reasoning

The court considered the principles of interlocutory injunctions and found that the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's application partially succeeds.

Orders

  • An order of temporary injunction is issued
  • A temporary order prohibiting the 1st and 2nd Respondents from making entries on the suit parcel of land
  • Costs of this application shall be costs in the cause

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction
  • Prohibition order

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Nguruman Limited vs Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others CA No. 77 of 2012 (2014) eKLR
  • Giella Vs. Cassman Brown (Supra)
  • Kenya National Examination Council versus Rep
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case