SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

M’Muraga & another v DCC Tigania Central Sub-County; Wairimu (Sued as the legal representatives of the Estate of John Nduati - Deceased) (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E023 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 658 (KLR) (9 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 658 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
658
Citation
[2026] KEELC 658 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for leave to initiate judicial review proceedings and stay implementation of a ministerial decisionCoramBM EBOSO
Holding

The application is allowed with the conditions that the ex-parte applicants are granted leave to initiate judicial review proceedings and a stay of implementation of the ministerial decision.

Facts

The ex-parte applicants seek leave to initiate judicial review proceedings to quash a ministerial decision dated 17/7/2025 in Appeal No. 209 of 2024, related to parcel number 6554, Giithu Adjudication Section.

Issues

  1. Whether the ex-parte applicants are granted leave to initiate judicial review proceedings
  2. Whether the ex-parte applicants are granted a stay of implementation of the ministerial decision

Reasoning

The court grants the application due to the absence of opposition from the respondent and interested party.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Leave granted to initiate judicial review proceedings
  • Stay of implementation of the ministerial decision granted

Remedies

  • Leave to initiate judicial review proceedings
  • Stay of implementation of the ministerial decision

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Land Adjudication Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case