SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nova Holdings Limited & another v County Government of Mombasa & 2 others (Constitutional Petition 52 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 817 (KLR) (19 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELC 817 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
817
Citation
[2026] KEELC 817 (KLR)
Decided
19 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondents' Application to set aside taxation decision and remit item 1 of the Applicant's Bill of CostsCoramAs Odunga, JO OLOLA
Holding

The Chamber Summons dated 19th December 2024 is incompetent and misconceived. The same is hereby struck out.

Facts

Nova Holdings Limited and Ashok Labshanker Doshi filed a Bill of Costs against the County Government of Mombasa and its Executive Committee Member, Land Housing and Physical Planning. The Taxing Officer taxed item 1 on instruction fees at Kshs. 28,250,000/=, which the Petitioners contested. The Respondents filed a Reference challenging the taxation decision.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondents' Reference is competent and misconceived
  2. Whether the taxation decision should be set aside and item 1 remitted for re-taxation

Reasoning

The Respondents filed the Reference three months outside the statutory time, which was not justified. The reasons for the taxation decision were already provided by the Taxing Officer, and the Respondents had no reason to wait for further reasons.

Outcome

The Chamber Summons is struck out.

Orders

  • The Chamber Summons dated 19th December 2024 is struck out

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Advocates Remuneration Order, 2014
Cases cited (2)
  • Kipkorir, Titoo & Kiara Advocates v The Deposit Protection Fund Board (2005) eKLR
  • Evans Thiga Gaturu v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited (2012) KEHC 4274 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case