BENTACK KILUNDO V SCHENKER LIMITED [2013] KEELRC 275 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 275
- Citation
- [2013] KEELRC 275 (KLR)
- Decided
- 24 May 2013
Summary at a glance
TypeIndustrial DisputePostureApplication for review of the Decree and Award of the Industrial CourtCoramMathews N. Nduma, Principal Judge, INDUSTRIAL COURT
The court reviews the decision, sets aside the award of 3 months' salary in lieu of notice, the award of payment in lieu of leave, and the award of gratuity, and substitutes them with 1 month's salary in lieu of notice, the setting aside of the leave award, and the setting aside of the gratuity award.
Facts
The Claimant, Bentack Kilundo, was summarily dismissed by the Respondent, Schenker Limited, and applied for review of the Industrial Court's decision.
Issues
- unlawful dismissal compensation
- payment in lieu of notice
- payment in lieu of leave
- gratuity award
Reasoning
The court found that the dismissal was not unlawful and that the Claimant had received salary increments and bonuses, indicating good service. The court also found that the leave award and gratuity award were contrary to the Employment Act and the National Social Security Fund.
Outcome
The court orders a review of the award, setting aside the 3 months' salary in lieu of notice, the leave award, and the gratuity award, and substitutes them with 1 month's salary in lieu of notice, the setting aside of the leave award, and the setting aside of the gratuity award.
Orders
- Substitute 3 months' salary in lieu of notice with 1 month's salary in lieu of notice
- Set aside the award of payment in lieu of leave
- Set aside the award of gratuity
- Order application for certificate of service to be retained
Remedies
- Payment of Kshs.546,814 to the Claimant
- Interest on the amount from the date of the award
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…