SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS V CORN PRODUCTS KENYA LIMITED,OKWANY CHARLES AND 17 OTHERS [2013] KEELRC 350 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 350 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
350
Citation
[2013] KEELRC 350 (KLR)
Decided
9 May 2013
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision to deny joinder of additional partiesCoramJames Rika
The application is refused, and the 18 former employees are ordered to file their own separate claims.

Facts

The Claimant Union filed a claim for redundancy on behalf of 105 members whose contracts were terminated by the Respondent. 18 former employees, not members of the Claimant Union, filed an application to be added as interested parties.

Issues

  • Whether the 18 former employees should be allowed to join the proceedings
  • Whether the 18 former employees were part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)

Reasoning

The Court denied the application to join the 18 former employees as they failed to show a relationship with the CBA and were not part of the Claimant Union's collective claim.

Outcome

The application is denied.

Orders

  • Application dated 26th October 2012 is refused
  • Applicants are at liberty to file their own separate claims
  • The Claimant and the Respondent will move the Court on the next course of action
  • No order on the costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Section 40 of the Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case