SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SAMSON GWER & 5 OTHERS V KENYA MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (KEMRI) & 2 OTHERS [2013] KEELRC 379 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 379 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
379
Citation
[2013] KEELRC 379 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetitionPostureOriginal trialCoramThe Hon. Judge
Holding

The High Court had jurisdiction to transfer the matter to the Industrial Court.

Facts

The petitioners are medical researchers who filed a petition in the High Court alleging contravention of fundamental rights and freedoms under the Constitution of Kenya 2010. The matter was transferred to the Industrial Court due to the issue arising from an employee/employer relationship.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to transfer the matter to the Industrial Court.
  2. Whether the petitioners' claim is resjudicata.

Reasoning

The court held that the High Court had jurisdiction to transfer the matter to the Industrial Court as the Industrial Court was not yet fully operational and functional at the time the petition was filed.

Outcome

The petitioners' claim was not resjudicata.

Orders

  • The High Court had authority to transfer the matter to the Industrial Court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (8)
  • Article 22 and 23 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 23 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 259 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 162 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 165(5) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 202 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Article 159(2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case