SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NAOMI J. MOROGO V VALLEY HOSPITAL LIMITED [2013] KEELRC 507 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 507 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
507
Citation
[2013] KEELRC 507 (KLR)
Decided
12 February 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondent Responded, Claimant Filed Memorandum of ClaimCoramHon. Justice Byram Ongaya
Holding

The termination was summary dismissal in contravention of the Employment Act, 2007

Facts

Claimant Naomi J. Morogo was employed by Respondent Valley Hospital Limited as a nurse from November 1, 2000. She was terminated on December 7, 2011, without notice or a formal reason, and received one month's salary in lieu. She served for 11 years.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination was lawful and fair under the Employment Act, 2007
  2. Whether the termination was summary dismissal

Reasoning

The court found the termination unlawful and unfair, citing the Employment Act, 2007, which requires notice or a lesser notice than statutory provisions or contractual terms for summary dismissal.

Outcome

Claimant's claim for severance pay, commissions, and other relief was granted.

Remedies

  • Severance pay for 11 years of service
  • Compensation based on section 49(c) of the Employment Act, 2007
  • Certificate of service as contained in section 51 of the Employment Act, 2007
  • Costs of the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • SHANKAR SAKLANI -VERSUS- DHL GLOBAL FORWARDING (K) LIMITED, Industrial Court Cause No. 562 of 2012 at Nairobi
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case