SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sensations Limited v Carlene Kalunde Lombo [2013] KEELRC 833 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 833 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
833
Citation
[2013] KEELRC 833 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant vs Respondent in Industrial Court of KenyaCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE MAUREEN ONYANGO
The Court finds for the Claimant and orders the Respondent to pay the sum of Kshs.32,000 as one month salary in lieu of notice and Kshs.152,724 as refund for the cost incurred for the training.

Facts

The Claimant, Sensations Limited, alleges that the Respondent, Carlene Kalunde Lombo, resigned without giving notice and failed to pay salary in lieu of notice. The Respondent was sponsored for training in Greece and incurred expenses, which she did not reimburse. The Claimant also claims a sum for overstated commission and balance of shoe sale on credit.

Issues

  • Employment contract terms and conditions
  • Notice period and salary in lieu
  • Training sponsorship and reimbursement
  • Overstated commission and shoe sale balance

Reasoning

The Court upholds the Claimant's allegations and orders the Respondent to pay the specified amounts.

Outcome

In favor of the Claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent Carlene Kalunde Lombo to pay the Claimant Sensations Limited the sum of Kshs.32,000 as one month salary in lieu of notice
  • The Respondent Carlene Kalunde Lombo to pay the Claimant Sensations Limited the sum of Kshs.152,724 as refund for the cost incurred for the training
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case