SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers v Mek Sacco Society Ltd [2014] KEELRC 121 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 121 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
121
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 121 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2014
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeIndustrial DisputePostureInterlocutory ApplicationCoramHellen S. Wasilwa
The court finds that the respondents have violated the greviants' rights by placing them on suspension for over 1 year and orders the suspension lifted.

Facts

The Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers filed an application against Mek Sacco Society Ltd alleging unfair and unlawful suspension of their members.

Issues

  • Validity of Collective Bargaining Agreement
  • Violation of greviants' rights by suspension for over 1 year
  • Remedies to be granted

Reasoning

The court rules that the suspension is unreasonable and violates the Constitution's provisions on fair labour practices and due process.

Outcome

Interim orders granted

Orders

  • Suspension lifted
  • Grievants paid arrears of 1/2 salary
  • Disciplinary process to be fair and expeditious

Remedies

  • Lift suspension
  • Pay arrears of 1/2 salary
  • Fair and expeditious disciplinary process

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Industrial Court Act 2011
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Labour Relations Act 2007
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • ILO Convention 98
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case