SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Luka Matara Seremani v Hanelis Restaurant Limited [2014] KEELRC 1214 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 1214 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1214
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 1214 (KLR)
Decided
30 July 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair Termination of EmploymentPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramLINNET NDOLO
Holding

The termination of the Claimant's employment was found to be unfair due to the lack of a valid reason and due process.

Facts

The Claimant, Luka Matara Seremani, was employed by the Respondent, Hanelis Restaurant Limited, as a waiter from January 31, 1992, to April 1, 2011. He was promoted to Assistant Manager. The Respondent terminated his employment on April 1, 2011, without providing a reason.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent established a valid reason for terminating the Claimant's employment
  2. Whether the Respondent used fair procedure in terminating the Claimant's employment
  3. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Respondent failed to provide a valid reason for the termination and did not follow the required procedure as outlined in the Employment Act, 2007.

Outcome

The Claimant was awarded 12 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination, two months' salary in lieu of notice, and service pay for the remainder of his service period.

Orders

  • Award of 12 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination
  • Award of two months' salary in lieu of notice
  • Award of service pay for the remainder of the Claimant's service period

Remedies

  • 12 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination
  • Two months' salary in lieu of notice
  • Service pay for the remainder of the Claimant's service period

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case