SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Daniel Githinji Waigano v Kenpipe Co-Operative Savings & Credit [2014] KEELRC 1299 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 1299 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1299
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 1299 (KLR)
Decided
30 September 2014
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeIndustrial DisputePostureAppeal from a High Court decisionCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE MAUREEN ONYANGO
The Court held that the Respondent did not provide the Claimant with the required 3 months notice for termination, thus the contract was not terminated in accordance with the terms.

Facts

The Claimant, Daniel Githinji Waigano, was employed as an Accounts Clerk by the Respondent, Kenpipe Co-operative Savings & Credit, on March 10, 1992. The contract was for a renewable fixed term of 3 years, with entitlements including house allowance, annual leave, medical allowance, and gratuity. The contract allowed for termination by either party with 3 months notice or pay in lieu, and service pay for termination by the Respondent for non-gross misconduct.

Issues

  • termination of contract
  • payment of gratuity
  • service pay

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent failed to provide the required notice for termination, leading to the contract not being terminated as per the agreement.

Outcome

The Court ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the required 3 months notice and service pay.

Orders

  • Order for payment of 3 months notice and service pay

Remedies

  • Payment of 3 months notice and service pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case