SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Benard A. Kagasi v For You Chinese Restaurant [2014] KEELRC 414 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 414 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
414
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 414 (KLR)
Decided
24 June 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair Termination of EmploymentPostureClaimant's Ex Parte HearingCoramLINNET NDOLO
Holding

The Court finds the termination of the Claimant's employment unfair and awards six months' pay in compensation plus one month's pay in lieu of notice, and severance pay at 15% of his monthly pay for every completed year of service.

Facts

Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a Chef from July 2003, with no written contract or payslip. He was terminated in February 2013 due to low business. He claimed various reliefs including reinstatement, salary, house allowance, overtime compensation, and damages.

Issues

  1. Whether there existed an employment relationship between the Claimant and the Respondent
  2. Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was lawful and fair
  3. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination was not in accordance with the Employment Act's conditions for redundancy, thus finding it unfair. The Claimant was awarded compensation and severance pay.

Outcome

Claimant's claim for unfair termination of employment was upheld.

Orders

  • Award of six months' pay in compensation
  • Award of one month's pay in lieu of notice
  • Award of severance pay at 15% of monthly pay for every completed year of service

Remedies

  • Compensation for six months' pay
  • One month's pay in lieu of notice
  • Severance pay at 15% of monthly pay for every completed year of service

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case