SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bishop Bakari Kea v Evangelical Lutheran Church In Kenya (ELCK) through Walter Obare Omwanza & 2 others [2014] KEELRC 546 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 546 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
546
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 546 (KLR)
Decided
12 February 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondents filed a Preliminary Objection challenging jurisdiction and alleging lack of exhaustion of internal church dispute resolution mechanisms.CoramHON. LADY JUSTICE MAUREEN ONYANGO
Holding

The Industrial Court has jurisdiction to hear the case as the claimant is an employee of the church.

Facts

The claimant, Bishop Bakari Kea, filed a case against the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Kenya (ELCK) through its Archbishop Walter Obare Omwanza and two other defendants. The claimant alleged that he was not an employee of the church and that the church had not exhausted its internal dispute resolution mechanisms.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Industrial Court
  2. Exhaustion of internal church dispute resolution mechanisms

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant is an employee of the church and that the Industrial Court has jurisdiction to hear the case. The court also dismissed the preliminary objection as the claimant had not ignored the internal dispute resolution mechanisms.

Outcome

The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Industrial Court Act 2011
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian' V Caltex Oil (Kenya) (1989) KLR1
  • Hinga & Another V PCEA Through Rev. Dr. Njoya & Another (1986) KLR316
  • Kimani Ngunjiri V David Manyara EKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case