SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jasper Nyaboga v Party of National Unity [2014] KEELRC 592 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 592 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
592
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 592 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeGarnishment ApplicationPostureRespondent's Application for ReviewCoramJames Rika
The sum of Kshs.4,636,625 shall be retained by the Claimant's Advocate as security for the Claimant's Gratuity Payment

Facts

Claimant made an application for garnishment of Kshs.4,639,625 as security for gratuity payment. The Court issued an order for garnishment on August 6, 2013, and made it absolute on December 9, 2013. The Respondent sought refund or deposit of the money in court.

Issues

  • Clarification of the order for release of money to the Claimant's Advocates
  • Retention of the money by the Claimant's Advocates as security

Reasoning

The Court clarified that the money was to be released to the Claimant's Advocates, not the Claimant in person. The Claimant's Advocates should ensure the money is in their Advocate-Client Account before any further steps are taken.

Outcome

The Respondent's application for review is granted.

Orders

  • The sum of Kshs.4,636,625 shall be retained by the Claimant's Advocate as security for the Claimant's Gratuity Payment
  • The Claimant's Advocates to ensure the said money is in their Advocate-Client Account before any further step can be taken in prosecution of the Claim

Remedies

  • No order on the costs
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case