SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sophie K. Muriithi v Felix Kirui T/A Supreme Health Clinic [2014] KEELRC 863 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 863 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
863
Citation
[2014] KEELRC 863 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeIndustrial DisputePostureAppeal from an award of the Industrial CourtCoramThe presiding judge
Holding

The Respondent's application for review is disallowed, and the error in the tabulation of the award is corrected by including the sum of Kshs. 12,075 being the Claimant's salary for the month of April 2012.

Facts

The Claimant, Sophie K. Muriithi, was employed by the Respondent, Felix Kirui T/A Supreme Health Clinic, as a Laboratory Technologist. The Respondent filed an application for review of the award, alleging that the Claimant's employment contract was based on an illegality due to her lack of registration with the Kenya Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Board.

Issues

  1. Employment contract validity
  2. Employment registration requirements
  3. Calculation of compensation

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent's application was based on a misinterpretation of the Medical Laboratory Technologists and Technologists Act, and that the Respondent had failed to prove non-compliance with the Act's requirements.

Outcome

The Respondent's application for review is dismissed.

Orders

  • Correction of the tabulation of the award to include the Claimant's salary for April 2012

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Medical Laboratory Technologists and Technologists Act
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Stephen Nyamweya and Another Vs Riley Services Limited (Industrial Court Cause No 2469 of 2012)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case