SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Meru Central Dairy Co-operative Union Limited [2015] KEELRC 102 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 102 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
102
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 102 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The court finds the termination unfair and orders the respondent to pay the grievant Kshs.156,000, issue a policy statement on sexual harassment, and pay costs.

Facts

The grievant, Mercy Kathure Magaju, was employed by the respondent, Meru Central Dairy Co-operative Union Limited, on 8.07.2008. She was initially a casual employee but later promoted to the quality control department. She was subjected to sexual harassment by her supervisor, Festus Mutheiti, who changed her work schedule to night shifts and asked her to write an apology letter. Despite reporting the harassment, she was transferred to the returns department and received warning letters. She was terminated on 23.11.2012 without a termination letter.

Issues

  • Unfair termination of employment
  • Sexual harassment by supervisor

Reasoning

The court found that the grievant was subjected to sexual harassment and that the employer failed to take appropriate disciplinary action. The court also noted that the employer did not issue a policy statement on sexual harassment.

Outcome

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Pay Kshs.156,000 to the grievant
  • Issue policy statement on sexual harassment
  • Pay costs of the suit
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case