Rachael Akoth Onyango v Rentokil (K) Limited [2015] KEELRC 1192 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1192
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 1192 (KLR)
- Decided
- 24 March 2015
Summary at a glance
TypeWrongful DismissalPostureAppeal from a summary dismissalCoramNzioki wa Makau
The Court finds that the Claimant was not dismissed but absconded from work.
Facts
Claimant was employed by Respondent from March 2005 to October 2010. She was injured in a road traffic accident on December 30, 2009, and was given 90 days off. She returned to work with crutches but was eventually dismissed.
Issues
- Whether the Claimant was dismissed by the Respondent
- Whether the Claimant absconded from work
Reasoning
The Claimant did not prove any dismissal and was paid until September 2010. She was given 90 days off after her accident and was not dismissed.
Outcome
Dismissal of the suit with costs
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…