SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

M W M v M F S [2015] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1455 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1455
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)
Decided
13 February 2015
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeIndustrial CourtPostureRespondent's Motion for review and setting aside of the impugned judgmentCoramO. N. Makau
The applicant's Motion for review is dismissed with costs.

Facts

The respondent sought to review and set aside the court's judgment on the grounds of existence of new and important evidence, existence of reasons justifying the setting aside of the judgment, and error apparent on the face of the record.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant has proved the grounds for review on a balance of probability.
  • Whether the applicant's counsel's failure to seek leave to enjoin the perpetrators of sexual harassment amounts to sufficient reason for review.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant did not prove the existence of new and important evidence, mistake or error apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason to warrant review. The court dismissed the allegation of negligence as insufficient.

Outcome

The applicant's Motion for review is dismissed.

Orders

  • The applicant's notice of Motion dated 24/6/2014 is dismissed with costs.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case