SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Beth Kalondu Mwema v Brand Kenya Board [2015] KEELRC 1488 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1488 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1488
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1488 (KLR)
Decided
4 February 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePostureInterlocutory Injunction ApplicationCoramMATHEWS N. NDUMA
Holding

The Court finds that the Applicant might not suffer irreparable harm if granted an interim injunction. The Court leaves the issues for determination upon hearing of the case on merits.

Facts

The Claimant, Beth Kalondu Mwema, was employed by the Respondent, Brand Kenya Board as a receptionist. She was diagnosed with hypertension and work-related stress by a doctor, and advised to avoid noisy environments and constant use of the telephone. The Respondent allegedly exposed her to an environment inimical to her health and verbally abused her.

Issues

  1. fair labor practices
  2. equality and freedom from discrimination
  3. safe working environment
  4. compensation for injuries and diseases
  5. payment of overtime

Reasoning

The Court applies the principles from Giella vs. Casman Brown & Co. Ltd. to determine that an interim injunction will not normally issue unless the applicant might suffer irreparable harm which would not be adequately compensated by an award of damages.

Outcome

The Court does not grant an interim injunction.

Remedies

  • payment of damages
  • craft appropriate orders against the offending officer(s) as demanded by the code of conduct of public officers under the Kenya Constitution 2010

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya Constitution 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Giella vs. Casman Brown & Co. Ltd.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case