SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial Food & Allied Workers v Tusker Mattresses Ltd [2015] KEELRC 1577 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1577 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1577
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1577 (KLR)
Decided
17 April 2015
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Conciliator's decisionCoramMATHEWS N. NDUMA
The court holds that the Respondent's interpretation and implementation of the CBA were correct, and the suit is dismissed.

Facts

The parties had a valid Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and a Recognition Agreement. The CBA included a wage increase for employees confirmed in their appointments as of February 28, 2013, and a further increase from March 1, 2014. The Respondent implemented the CBA by loading the 10% wage increase on February 28, 2013 wages and adjusting all wages to conform with the General Wage Order of 2013.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondent correctly implemented the CBA wage increases

Reasoning

The court considers the CBA's effective date and the General Wages Order's effective date, ruling that the CBA's wage increases did not need to consider the General Wages Order's minimum wages before it became effective.

Outcome

The suit is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Regulation of Wages General (Amendment) Order 2013
  • General Wages Order 2013
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case