SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lawrence Omondi v Creative Eye (K) Limited [2015] KEELRC 181 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 181 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
181
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 181 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramAbuodha J. N.
Holding

The Court orders the respondent to pay the claimant fifteen days salary as severance pay for the period between August 1, 2013, and July 31, 2014, and to pay the claimant costs of the suit.

Facts

The claimant, Lawrence Omondi, was employed as an art director by the respondent, Creative Eye (K) Limited, from August 1, 2013, to April 30, 2015. The contract was terminated due to poor business performance and closure of the Kenya office. The respondent implemented a 30% pay cut for senior management staff starting November 2014.

Issues

  1. Underpayment of salary
  2. Fairness of termination of services
  3. Severance pay

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimant's signing of the letter confirming the salary reduction barred him from claiming underpayment. The closure of the Kenya office was a redundancy, but the respondent did not follow the required procedures, making the termination unfair.

Outcome

Claimant wins

Orders

  • Seventeen days salary as severance pay for the period between August 1, 2013, and July 31, 2014
  • Claimant to be awarded costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Seventeen days salary as severance pay for the period between August 1, 2013, and July 31, 2014
  • Claimant to be awarded costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case