SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Fredrick Odhiambo v Kenya Safari Lodges & Hotels Ltd [2015] KEELRC 197 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 197 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
197
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 197 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant seeks recalculation of terminal dues and final settlement, Respondent denies liability and claims full payment was made.CoramO.N. MAKAU
Judgment is entered for the Claimant for the sum of kshs3,369,552.50 plus costs and interest.

Facts

Claimant worked for Respondent from 1984 to 2014, rising from cashier to General Manager. He resigned on 8.8.2014 and signed a settlement agreement and discharge voucher for kshs.3,481,417.50.

Issues

  • Whether the signing of the settlement agreement and discharge voucher fully relieved the respondent from liability for any further claims by the claimant.
  • Whether the calculation of the claimant's dues by the respondent was erroneous and in breach of the terms of their contract.
  • Whether the court should recalculate the claimant's terminal dues.

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant accepted the settlement agreement and discharge voucher as full and final settlement, but the claimant's counsel argued that the settlement was not freely executed due to financial stress and undue influence.

Outcome

Claimant wins, awarded kshs3,369,552.50 plus costs and interest.

Orders

  • Judgment for the Claimant for the sum of kshs3,369,552.50 plus costs and interest.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Muthaiga county club vs Simon Wachira Muhuro (2009)eKLR
  • Southern Cross Company [SECO] vs David Anzani Ombeba [2015] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case