Daniel Inguna Ndatho v Texas Alarms (K) [2015] KEELRC 245 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 245
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 245 (KLR)
- Decided
- 13 November 2015
Summary at a glance
TypeUnfair DismissalPostureAppeal from a decision to strike out the suitCoramONESMUS MAKAU
The court finds the suit time barred and strikes it out.
Facts
The claimant, Daniel Inguna Ndatho, was employed as a security guard by the respondent, Texas Alarms (K), from January 4, 2006, until October 1, 2011. He failed to report back to work after his annual leave and was subsequently terminated.
Issues
- whether the suit is time barred
- whether the claimant deserted work or was unfairly dismissed by the respondent
- whether the reliefs sought should issue
Reasoning
The claim for compensation for unfair termination of employment and claims for employment terminal dues are time barred due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
Outcome
The suit is struck out.
Orders
- The suit is struck out.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…