SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis M. Njeruh v Mabel Imbuga & 9 others [2015] KEELRC 281 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 281 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
281
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 281 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureApplication for contempt of courtCoramMbaru, Nduma, TH
Holding

The Respondents were committed to jail for six months for contempt of court.

Facts

Interim orders were set aside on March 28, 2014, and the position of Deputy Vice Chancellor (Finance) was advertised on February 7, 2014. The interim orders were in place until February 27, 2014, when the position was advertised again.

Issues

  1. Did the Respondents act in defiance of Court orders?
  2. If the answer to (i) above is in the affirmative, were the orders of the Court properly served on them?
  3. What remedy, if any, is available to the Claimant / Applicant.

Reasoning

The Claimant demonstrated that the Respondents advertised the position of Deputy Vice Chancellor (Finance) while the interim orders were in place, which was in defiance of the court's orders.

Outcome

The Respondents were committed to jail for six months.

Orders

  • Commit the Respondents to jail for six months.
  • Declare the purported recruitment proceedings held on July 17, 2014, null and void.
  • Grant an injunction to restrain the Respondents from taking any further steps to fill the positions of Deputy Vice Chancellor (Finance) and Deputy Vice Chancellor (Administration).

Remedies

  • Commitment to jail for six months.
  • Fine of Kshs.500,000 for contempt of court.
  • Injunction to restrain the Respondents from taking further steps to fill the positions.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case