SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers Union v Mutuguta Farmers Co-operative Society Limited [2015] KEELRC 323 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 323 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
323
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 323 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2015
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from a decision dismissing a motion for a stay of execution and for a re-taxing of costsCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The court dismissed the claimant's suit with costs, extended the time for filing the objection to the taxing master's decision, and stayed the execution proceedings until the lapsing of the 14 days prescribed in subparagraph 11(2) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.

Facts

The respondent instructed Hippo Auctioneers to attach the claimant's moveable assets to recover costs of the suit amounting to Kshs. 451, 039.00. The claimant was not served with the notice on ruling on taxation and the decree. The respondent never demanded the payment of costs as taxed before execution process was invoked.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent's attachment of the claimant's moveable assets was valid
  • Whether the taxation of costs was valid and whether the claimant was served with the decree and certificate of taxation

Reasoning

The court considered the need to enhance good industrial relations and accord justice in the matter, extending the time for filing the objection and staying the execution proceedings.

Outcome

Claimant's suit dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Extension of time for filing the objection to the taxing master's decision
  • Stay of execution proceedings until the lapsing of the 14 days prescribed in subparagraph 11(2) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order

Remedies

  • Claimant bears the respondent's costs of the application

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Advocates (Remuneration) Order
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case